Frustration and Prop 98
May 27, 2008Did I mention I’ve been frustrated?
This is particularly important for those of you in California preparing to vote on Proposition 98. However, I believe everyone will benefit from the post, so please stick around.
I received two things in the mail today.
First, I received an over-sized postcard from the National Tax Limitation Committee telling me that all good conservatives and anyone who is in favor of limiting taxes must vote YES on 98 and NO on 99!
Proposition 98: The only Prop which protects all property: homes, small businesses, farmers, renters, open space, & houses of worship from being forcibly seized by government and given to developers. Republican Party Endorsed.
Second, I received an email from my mom, who insightfully sees things as they are and not as they are being deceptively disguised. Here is her email to me.
Friends, family
After nearly four decades of voting in California elections I find that not much has changed. The initiative system is still being used by special interest groups to confuse voters with emotional appeals. Prop 98 is about rent control. It is not about eminent domain. Almost all donations to the Pro 98 funding have come from apartment and mobile home park owners, many of whom are out of state landlords. About 1.1 million Californians benefit from rent controlled properties. As you know, California is an increasingly hostile environment to low and fixed income people. Rent control allows seniors to stay near family and offers low income workers affordable housing. If you disagree with rent control, let that be the issue, undisguised.
Proposition 13 is NOT endangered by rejecting Proposition 98. This claim is meant to alarm
millions of homeowners. Proposition 98 WILL endanger public water works, coastal and
wetland projects, etc . Proposition 98 is so badly drafted that California courts will be hearing
cases for decades, an expense our state does not need.I realize that some of you may not agree with me, if so, thank you for your time. If you do agree
that a No on Prop 98 and a Yes on Prop 99 makes sense, please pass this email, or your own, on to your friends and family.Please vote on June 3rd, the drafters of this legislation have chosen a “low turnout” election hoping to slip this through unnoticed. Thank for letting me make my case, I promise to return the courtesy.
I love my mother. Now this is a perfect example of what I was getting at in my last post. I am willing to bet that most of you know little to nothing about what is truly within Proposition 98. I would further bet that most of you will vote according to a “Guide” that has been mailed to you or that you will pick up at your church or that you will download from your political party’s Web site. Finally, I guarantee that most if not all of you will not think a thing about any of this until you grab the guide on your way out the door, if you even remember to vote. Sound about right?
So what? Am I expecting you to read through every proposition and measure before carefully casting your vote? Well, ideally, yes. But, realistically, no. What I am expecting you to do is vote based on more than junk mail and party guidelines. Get out your google; consider who is footing the bill for these propositions; and perhaps most importantly, find some real people who are going to be effected by these proposals and get their take on it. Will they be biased? Probably. But will they have a reason? Most definitely. Determine what those reasons are and then make an informed decision.
Regarding my mail today, I can’t help but laugh a little. On the one hand you have a committee of no-names hiding behind junk mail, spending tons of money telling you to vote YES on 98. In true salesmen fashion they appeal to your emotions, suggesting that anything but a Yes vote will mean that the government will forcibly seize you from your home, small business, farm, apartment, open space, church or temple. How could you possibly be against this? In fact, how would you dare be against this? Notice that they managed to include virtually every possible property or location you could care about?
On the other hand you have the plea of a woman who is friends with many people who actually will lose their homes if you vote yes on 98. Every day she interacts with grandmothers and grandfathers who are able to be in the same state with their families because, thanks to rent control, they are able to afford a small, modest apartment or mobile home. She lives near numerous people who proudly work long days for next to nothing because, at the end of the day they have a roof over their head and a safe place for their children.
This is exactly the type of information you should be pursuing when voting on such propositions. This is the kind of information that should cause you to question what you are being told and think about things a little more carefully. Listen, believe what you will, but at least have a legitimate reason for your belief. If you are a landlord wanting to price your tenants out to the street so you can make a buck, then I guess that’s your right. If you are sympathetic to the plight of the landlord, then I suppose you can still vote Yes on 98. But if you are voting Yes because junk mail told you so or because “Republicans support 98″ then you are simply voting irresponsibly. If you mark your ballot according to what the most persuasive commercial said, then you are only part of the problem (hint: follow the money and you will learn a lot).
Please take a moment to visit the No on 98 Web site. If Proposition 98 does not apply to you, I hope you will take what I have shared today and apply it to the propositions and measures of your own county and state. It is the responsible thing to do. The lives and livelihood of many people may be determined by your vote. Make it count.
Posted by Dan




